Meaning
判例 (はんれい, hanrei) is a bonus vocabulary word meaning “precedent”.
Kanji in this word
Example sentences 11
この 件は 判例があります
This matter has a judicial precedent.
調書・裁判記録・判例など。
Protocols, records of trials and judicial precedents were included among them.
それぞれの判例を一則、二則と数える。
Each example of koan is counted as Issoku (one), Nisoku (two).
これに判例などの事例を増補したのが第三版(1846年)である。
The third version (1848) was added with court cases and so on.
近年、TBT協定の解釈が、TBT委員会やWTO判例を通じて明確化しつつある。
In recent years, interpretations of the TBT Agreement are becoming clearer through the activities of the TBT Committee and relevant WTO cases which has increased in number.
御仕置例類集(おしおきるいれいしゅう)とは、江戸幕府が作成した刑事事件に関する判例集。
Oshioki Ruireishu was a compilation of law reports dealing with criminal cases, which was created by the Edo bakufu.○
パブリシティ権と表現の自由の緊張関係については、上記裁判例を踏まえた今後の学説・判例の進展が注目される。
The future development of theories and judicial precedents based on the aforementioned judicial precedents are notable in connection with how to resolve the conflict of interests between the publicity rights and the freedom of expression.
如仏の判決(にょぶつのはんけつ)は、囲碁のルールのうちの死活において「両劫に仮生一つ」を認めたという鎌倉時代の判例。
Judgment of Nyobutsu is a leading case in Kamakura period concerning the life-and-death judgment in the rules of Igo (board game of capturing territory), admitting a kasho (tentative life) in double ko.
第二百五十三条 判例と相反する判断をしたことを理由として上告の申立をした場合には、上告趣意書にその判例を具体的に示さなければならない。
Article 253 In cases where a motion for a final appeal has been filed based on grounds that the determination that was made was inconsistent with precedents, the appellant in the final appeal shall concretely indicate said precedents in the statement of the reasons for a final appeal.
三 最高裁判所の判例がない場合に、大審院若しくは上告裁判所たる高等裁判所の判例又はこの法律施行後の控訴裁判所たる高等裁判所の判例と相反する判断をしたこと。
(iii) In the event that there is no Supreme court precedent, a determination has been rendered that conflicts with a precedent of the former Supreme Court (daishin'in) or a high court that was the court of the final appellate instance, or that conflicts with a precedent of a high court that was the court of second instance at a time after the enforcement date of this Act.
このような無権限者に対する弁済に関する当事者間の約款の効力について参考となる判例として最高裁平成5年7月19日第二小法廷判決・判例時報1489号111頁がある。
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan, 2nd Petty Bench, July 19, 1993, 1489 Hanrei Jiho 111, is the leading case regarding the validity of clauses in general contractual conditions (banking clauses) concerning fund transfers to an unauthorized person.